![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
What is the better to cache pages or data sources? I have asp.net application that uses ArrayLists as datasources for repeaters. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
hi, if you cache the dataset you need to process and generate the page again. that page is almost same since the data is not changed(cached data). so it is better to cache the page. it will save DB processing as well as application server processing. CMA "TomislaW" <tomislav147 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:#rZEQoQ3EHA.3120 (AT) TK2MSFTNGP12 (DOT) phx.gbl... What is the better to cache pages or data sources? I have asp.net application that uses ArrayLists as datasources for repeaters. |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
What about images? Are they cached too? I have pages with lot of images. "CMA" <cmallawaarachchi (AT) textcentric (DOT) lk> wrote in message news:O3$Z3f04EHA.3120 (AT) TK2MSFTNGP12 (DOT) phx.gbl... hi, if you cache the dataset you need to process and generate the page again. that page is almost same since the data is not changed(cached data). so it is better to cache the page. it will save DB processing as well as application server processing. CMA "TomislaW" <tomislav147 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:#rZEQoQ3EHA.3120 (AT) TK2MSFTNGP12 (DOT) phx.gbl... What is the better to cache pages or data sources? I have asp.net application that uses ArrayLists as datasources for repeaters. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |