Hi,
I am trying to declare a container and then add anonymous types to it. I
want to end up with something I can use with LINQ, but the normal way to load
a list doesn't work -- I don't know how to declare the target container. the
syntax should be something like: var[] list = <??>; but I need to declare
the container before I have a var.

TYPE list = new TYPE(); // I don't know how to declare a list of anonymous?
foreach (string nm in someList)
{
list.Add( new { Name = nm, Company = aComp };
}

I need a new pattern for LINQ.
Thanks

(This would be better off in the C# group, btw - the CLR is unaware of
anonymous types.)

ChrisA <ChrisA (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote:
You can't declare the target container ahead of time in that way. Two
options:

1) Use LINQ queries instead of manually adding things to the list. For
instance:

var list = someList.Select(x => new { Name = x, Company = aComp })
.ToList();

2) Create the list using type inference and a generic method which just
creates an empty list, e.g.

var list = CreateEmptyList(new { Name="Dummy", Company="Dummy" };
....
List<T> CreateEmptyList<T> (T sampleElement)
{
return new List<T>();
}

Personally I'd prefer the first route.

--
Jon Skeet - <skeet (AT) pobox (DOT) com>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet
World class .NET training in the UK: http://iterativetraining.co.uk

Jon,
Sorry about posting to the wrong area. I didn't realize anonymous types
weren't in the CLR.

I think I can get your first suggestion to work. Is it possible to
declare a variable inside the lambda? I need something like:
(x =>
string[] fields = x.Split();
new { name = fields[0], company = fields[1];
)
but I'm getting compiler errors.

I appologize for taking up your time -- I clearly have a lot of reading to
do before I've got this down.

Thanks

Jon,
Got it - just needed the brackets.

Thanks for the help. The new 3.5 features are even better than I
expected, now that I'm starting to build real code.

ChrisA <ChrisA (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote:
No problem It's often not made terribly clear which things are
language features, which are framework (library features) and which are
CLR features. The CLR for .NET 3.5 is the same as for .NET 2.0.

Can I give a quick shameless plug?

http://manning.com/skeet

And there's no need to apologise - if I didn't want to take time
helping people, I wouldn't be here

--
Jon Skeet - <skeet (AT) pobox (DOT) com>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet
World class .NET training in the UK: http://iterativetraining.co.uk