Hi,

I'm a little bit confused with this new System.Transactions namespace.
I was able to understand its propose, but it looks like it is the
replacement for EnterpriseService (ServicedComponent) when all you want
from COM+ is the transaction coordination.

I'm about to start a new project and I have to decide how to architect
the components. I'd like to know if is possible to use only single
assemblies without all the COM+ stuffs (packages, registration, etc).

My environment: .NET 2.0, Win2003, SQL 2000 and Oracle 9i.

Thanks,

David

Hello dalssoft (AT) gmail (DOT) com,

Don't quite understand you.

System.Transaction is just a revision of existed transactions.
You needn't use COM+ to use transactions in you code in .net 2.0

WBR,
Michael Nemtsev :: blog: http://spaces.msn.com/laflour

"At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not
cease to be insipid." (c) Friedrich Nietzsche

I've got the answer in the Transaction forum.

http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/Sho...48685&SiteID=1

Thanks,

David


"Michael Nemtsev" <nemtsev (AT) msn (DOT) com> wrote