![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi all! I have a 4D database to witch I connect with a asp.net page via ODBC. This is extreamly slow and 4D:s ODBC driver is not so stable. Is there a simple way to "run" a sql server together with this 4D database, with exactly the same data in the selected tables? Letīs say I want to get persons from a person table joined with address, postal code. Do this with the 4D ODBC is almost impossible. It takes to loong time, if it works at all. If I could run ms sql server and 4D server together where ms sql just contains the requested tables the problem would be solved. The reason to this idea is that we shall move from 4D to ms sql. Any thoughts, ideas or what ever is welcome ![]() /Marre |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi all! I have a 4D database to witch I connect with a asp.net page via ODBC. This is extreamly slow and 4D:s ODBC driver is not so stable. Is there a simple way to "run" a sql server together with this 4D database, with exactly the same data in the selected tables? Letīs say I want to get persons from a person table joined with address, postal code. Do this with the 4D ODBC is almost impossible. It takes to loong time, if it works at all. If I could run ms sql server and 4D server together where ms sql just contains the requested tables the problem would be solved. The reason to this idea is that we shall move from 4D to ms sql. Any thoughts, ideas or what ever is welcome ![]() /Marre |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi all! I have a 4D database to witch I connect with a asp.net page via ODBC. This is extreamly slow and 4D:s ODBC driver is not so stable. Is there a simple way to "run" a sql server together with this 4D database, with exactly the same data in the selected tables? Letīs say I want to get persons from a person table joined with address, postal code. Do this with the 4D ODBC is almost impossible. It takes to loong time, if it works at all. If I could run ms sql server and 4D server together where ms sql just contains the requested tables the problem would be solved. The reason to this idea is that we shall move from 4D to ms sql. Any thoughts, ideas or what ever is welcome ![]() /Marre |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |