HighTechTalks DotNet Forums  

.NET Framework 2 & SyncToys

Dotnet Framework microsoft.public.dotnet.framework


Discuss .NET Framework 2 & SyncToys in the Dotnet Framework forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
Kate
 
Posts: n/a

Default .NET Framework 2 & SyncToys - 12-07-2007 , 12:46 PM






I need to download .NET Framework 2.0.50727 to run SyncToys v1.4 but
am given three choices, namely : x86 version, x64 version and xIA64
version. Can someone tell me which one I need please? I have Win XP
Home.

Many thanks
Kate


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
Jerry
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: .NET Framework 2 & SyncToys - 12-07-2007 , 02:54 PM






x86 version

"Kate" <@*slamaspam*.demon.co.uk> wrote

Quote:
I need to download .NET Framework 2.0.50727 to run SyncToys v1.4 but
am given three choices, namely : x86 version, x64 version and xIA64
version. Can someone tell me which one I need please? I have Win XP
Home.

Many thanks
Kate




Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old   
Kate
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: .NET Framework 2 & SyncToys - 12-07-2007 , 03:14 PM



Thank you very much. I would like to learn a bit more, for example,
why "x86" for 32 bit? 86 = 32? Seems rather cryptic to me. Can you
suggest a website for further information, please?

Thanks again
Kate

"Jerry" <ChiefZekeNoSpam (AT) MSN (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
x86 version

"Kate" <@*slamaspam*.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:%230DBFGQOIHA.1208 (AT) TK2MSFTNGP05 (DOT) phx.gbl...
I need to download .NET Framework 2.0.50727 to run SyncToys v1.4 but
am given three choices, namely : x86 version, x64 version and xIA64
version. Can someone tell me which one I need please? I have Win
XP
Home.

Many thanks
Kate





Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old   
Jack Jackson
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: .NET Framework 2 & SyncToys - 12-07-2007 , 04:05 PM



The original 32-bit Intel CPU used in PCs was the 80386, which was
followed by the 80486 and Pentium (sometimes called the 586). The
architecture used in the 80386 and later 32-bit CPUs (including the
AMD versions) is often referred to as x86.

CPUs that build on the x86 architecture but support 64 bit data are
referred to as x64.

A separate 64-bit Intel CPU architecture is used by the Itanium chips,
called xIA64.

Wikipedia has a lot of info on all of these.

On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 21:14:28 -0000, "Kate" <@*slamaspam*.demon.co.uk>
wrote:

Quote:
Thank you very much. I would like to learn a bit more, for example,
why "x86" for 32 bit? 86 = 32? Seems rather cryptic to me. Can you
suggest a website for further information, please?

Thanks again
Kate

"Jerry" <ChiefZekeNoSpam (AT) MSN (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:OCmknNROIHA.5264 (AT) TK2MSFTNGP02 (DOT) phx.gbl...
x86 version

"Kate" <@*slamaspam*.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:%230DBFGQOIHA.1208 (AT) TK2MSFTNGP05 (DOT) phx.gbl...
I need to download .NET Framework 2.0.50727 to run SyncToys v1.4 but
am given three choices, namely : x86 version, x64 version and xIA64
version. Can someone tell me which one I need please? I have Win
XP
Home.

Many thanks
Kate




Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old   
Kate
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: .NET Framework 2 & SyncToys - 12-07-2007 , 04:58 PM



That explains the "x86", but I`m even more intrigued now. Was the
number 80386 chosen at random, or does it have some significance?
After all, it`s not divisible by 32. I can see I shall have to have a
search of Wikipedia. Thanks for putting me on the trail :-)

Kate

"Jack Jackson" <jacknospam (AT) pebbleridge (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
The original 32-bit Intel CPU used in PCs was the 80386, which was
followed by the 80486 and Pentium (sometimes called the 586). The
architecture used in the 80386 and later 32-bit CPUs (including the
AMD versions) is often referred to as x86.

CPUs that build on the x86 architecture but support 64 bit data are
referred to as x64.

A separate 64-bit Intel CPU architecture is used by the Itanium
chips,
called xIA64.

Wikipedia has a lot of info on all of these.

On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 21:14:28 -0000, "Kate" <@*slamaspam*.demon.co.uk
wrote:

Thank you very much. I would like to learn a bit more, for
example,
why "x86" for 32 bit? 86 = 32? Seems rather cryptic to me. Can
you
suggest a website for further information, please?

Thanks again
Kate

"Jerry" <ChiefZekeNoSpam (AT) MSN (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:OCmknNROIHA.5264 (AT) TK2MSFTNGP02 (DOT) phx.gbl...
x86 version

"Kate" <@*slamaspam*.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:%230DBFGQOIHA.1208 (AT) TK2MSFTNGP05 (DOT) phx.gbl...
I need to download .NET Framework 2.0.50727 to run SyncToys v1.4
but
am given three choices, namely : x86 version, x64 version and
xIA64
version. Can someone tell me which one I need please? I have
Win
XP
Home.

Many thanks
Kate





Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old   
Peter Duniho
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: .NET Framework 2 & SyncToys - 12-07-2007 , 05:37 PM



On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 14:58:37 -0800, Kate <@*slamaspam*.demon.co.uk> wrote:

Quote:
That explains the "x86", but I`m even more intrigued now. Was the
number 80386 chosen at random, or does it have some significance?
After all, it`s not divisible by 32. I can see I shall have to have a
search of Wikipedia. Thanks for putting me on the trail :-)
Wikipedia may elaborate for you. I think this article is a decent
starting point: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8086

Jack's explanation isn't really complete, as the 32-bit-ness of the CPU is
irrelevant to the actual origin of x86. The "original" x86 CPU was the
8086, a 16-bit CPU. The original IBM PC used the 8088, an 8-bit version
of the 8086 (well, it had an 8-bit data bus, anyway). "x86" is used to
describe the entire line of CPUs that evolved from that beginning, and/or
the instruction set (e.g. AMD, Cyrix x86-compatible CPUs).

In other words, x86 isn't used to refer to 32-bit. It's used to refer to
an entire class of CPUs and their instruction sets. The marketing
genuises have simply complicated the issue by using x64 to refer to the
64-bit iteration of the x86 line. This has led to a sort of retro-active
re-definition of x86 as meaning 32-bit, but that's not really what it
means.

Kind of dumb, IMHO, but then I find most marketing kind of dumb (including
the term ".NET" ).

Pete


Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old   
Jack Jackson
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: .NET Framework 2 & SyncToys - 12-08-2007 , 01:15 AM



The initial Intel CPU with a 16-bit bus was the 8086, then came the
80186, 80286, 80386, 80486 and the Pentium, which was sometimes called
the 80586. So essentially the number before the 86 is just a version
number.

On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 22:58:37 -0000, "Kate" <@*slamaspam*.demon.co.uk>
wrote:

Quote:
That explains the "x86", but I`m even more intrigued now. Was the
number 80386 chosen at random, or does it have some significance?
After all, it`s not divisible by 32. I can see I shall have to have a
search of Wikipedia. Thanks for putting me on the trail :-)

Kate

"Jack Jackson" <jacknospam (AT) pebbleridge (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:l5gjl3hbi859rk09slbdk9u1s9ej064doq (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...
The original 32-bit Intel CPU used in PCs was the 80386, which was
followed by the 80486 and Pentium (sometimes called the 586). The
architecture used in the 80386 and later 32-bit CPUs (including the
AMD versions) is often referred to as x86.

CPUs that build on the x86 architecture but support 64 bit data are
referred to as x64.

A separate 64-bit Intel CPU architecture is used by the Itanium
chips,
called xIA64.

Wikipedia has a lot of info on all of these.

On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 21:14:28 -0000, "Kate" <@*slamaspam*.demon.co.uk
wrote:

Thank you very much. I would like to learn a bit more, for
example,
why "x86" for 32 bit? 86 = 32? Seems rather cryptic to me. Can
you
suggest a website for further information, please?

Thanks again
Kate

"Jerry" <ChiefZekeNoSpam (AT) MSN (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:OCmknNROIHA.5264 (AT) TK2MSFTNGP02 (DOT) phx.gbl...
x86 version

"Kate" <@*slamaspam*.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:%230DBFGQOIHA.1208 (AT) TK2MSFTNGP05 (DOT) phx.gbl...
I need to download .NET Framework 2.0.50727 to run SyncToys v1.4
but
am given three choices, namely : x86 version, x64 version and
xIA64
version. Can someone tell me which one I need please? I have
Win
XP
Home.

Many thanks
Kate




Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old   
Kate
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: .NET Framework 2 & SyncToys - 12-08-2007 , 09:31 AM



Thank you Jack and Peter for the extra info. I am still going to
follow up the Wikipedia article, but now that I know the numbers
before the 86 have no esoteric significance, I shall not waste time
trying to find out.

Kate

"Jack Jackson" <jacknospam (AT) pebbleridge (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
The initial Intel CPU with a 16-bit bus was the 8086, then came the
80186, 80286, 80386, 80486 and the Pentium, which was sometimes
called
the 80586. So essentially the number before the 86 is just a
version
number.

On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 22:58:37 -0000, "Kate" <@*slamaspam*.demon.co.uk
wrote:

That explains the "x86", but I`m even more intrigued now. Was the
number 80386 chosen at random, or does it have some significance?
After all, it`s not divisible by 32. I can see I shall have to have
a
search of Wikipedia. Thanks for putting me on the trail :-)

Kate

"Jack Jackson" <jacknospam (AT) pebbleridge (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:l5gjl3hbi859rk09slbdk9u1s9ej064doq (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...
The original 32-bit Intel CPU used in PCs was the 80386, which was
followed by the 80486 and Pentium (sometimes called the 586). The
architecture used in the 80386 and later 32-bit CPUs (including
the
AMD versions) is often referred to as x86.

CPUs that build on the x86 architecture but support 64 bit data
are
referred to as x64.

A separate 64-bit Intel CPU architecture is used by the Itanium
chips,
called xIA64.

Wikipedia has a lot of info on all of these.

On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 21:14:28 -0000, "Kate"
@*slamaspam*.demon.co.uk
wrote:

Thank you very much. I would like to learn a bit more, for
example,
why "x86" for 32 bit? 86 = 32? Seems rather cryptic to me. Can
you
suggest a website for further information, please?

Thanks again
Kate

"Jerry" <ChiefZekeNoSpam (AT) MSN (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:OCmknNROIHA.5264 (AT) TK2MSFTNGP02 (DOT) phx.gbl...
x86 version

"Kate" <@*slamaspam*.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:%230DBFGQOIHA.1208 (AT) TK2MSFTNGP05 (DOT) phx.gbl...
I need to download .NET Framework 2.0.50727 to run SyncToys v1.4
but
am given three choices, namely : x86 version, x64 version and
xIA64
version. Can someone tell me which one I need please? I have
Win
XP
Home.

Many thanks
Kate





Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old   
Peter van der Goes
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: .NET Framework 2 & SyncToys - 01-03-2008 , 12:01 PM





"Kate" <@*slamaspam*.demon.co.uk> wrote

Quote:
I need to download .NET Framework 2.0.50727 to run SyncToys v1.4 but
am given three choices, namely : x86 version, x64 version and xIA64
version. Can someone tell me which one I need please? Ir XP Home.

Many thanks
Kate

For XP Home, you need the x86 version.



Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.