![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Think outside the box! ************************************************* |
|
there seems to be some overhead between SQL Server 2005 and a CLR function written in C#. Why is this? I have a simple wraper around System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch.GetTimestamp() : public partial class UserDefinedFunctions { [Microsoft.SqlServer.Server.SqlFunction] public static long GetTimestampF() { return System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch.GetTimestamp(); } }; but if i run this it is hardly accurate. the time of getting from sql server to a CLR function seems to be relatively slow for nanosecond calculations: DECLARE @before bigint DECLARE @after bigint SET @before = dbo.GetTimestampF() -- do something SET @after = dbo.GetTimestampF() SELECT @after - @before as nanoseconds is there nyway to elimitate this overhead so that dbo.GetTimestampF() executes as fast for TSQL as it is to call GetTimestampF() in C#? If i call my GetTimestampF() on c# it executes fast enough for the nanosecond results to be accurate |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |