![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi, I started off yesterday with what seemed like a simple requirement - for an intranet ASP.Net (2.0) application using Windows authentication, use Active Directory to get the Full Name and Email address for the logged in user. This was my first time I'd looked into AD, having not needed to access it before and our network is managed by a separate department - so was learning from ground up. In the end I got a prototype working, but it required a valid NT user name password to be stored either in the code (to be passed into DirectoryEntry()) or in web.config for impersonatation. Whilst the relevant section of the web.config could be encrypted, I don't believe it's an ideal solution, if only because our passwords change every 'n' days (SBOX requirement). I read something about anonymous access for DirectoryEntry(), however it would appear that our AD has not been configured to allow this, nor can I get that changed. Googling on the web, I see this to be a fairly common issue - however the solution (or workaround) of storing user details in web.config just isn't workable for us. I have another solution in my head, but it feels slightly over-engineered. As my AD exposure is very limited, I was wondering what other people think or if they've found another solution. Basically I'm thinking I could create a windows service that ran under the NETWORK user, which handled calls to AD. This windows service could be accessed by the website, using .Net Remoting. This way, the NT user details are not being stored anywhere that is not secure (i.e. website details in IIS admin and web service in relevant MMC service property). If the NETWORK user does not have enough rights, I believe I'll be able to release the windows service to our dept that managed AD - they could install it onto a single server running under one of the service accounts (which is not subject to the password change policy). What do people think, does this seem like a workable solution, is there something similar freely available? Regards, - Paul Hadfield. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi, I started off yesterday with what seemed like a simple requirement - for an intranet ASP.Net (2.0) application using Windows authentication, use Active Directory to get the Full Name and Email address for the logged in user. This was my first time I'd looked into AD, having not needed to access it before and our network is managed by a separate department - so was learning from ground up. In the end I got a prototype working, but it required a valid NT user name password to be stored either in the code (to be passed into DirectoryEntry()) or in web.config for impersonatation. Whilst the relevant section of the web.config could be encrypted, I don't believe it's an ideal solution, if only because our passwords change every 'n' days (SBOX requirement). I read something about anonymous access for DirectoryEntry(), however it would appear that our AD has not been configured to allow this, nor can I get that changed. Googling on the web, I see this to be a fairly common issue - however the solution (or workaround) of storing user details in web.config just isn't workable for us. I have another solution in my head, but it feels slightly over-engineered. As my AD exposure is very limited, I was wondering what other people think or if they've found another solution. Basically I'm thinking I could create a windows service that ran under the NETWORK user, which handled calls to AD. This windows service could be accessed by the website, using .Net Remoting. This way, the NT user details are not being stored anywhere that is not secure (i.e. website details in IIS admin and web service in relevant MMC service property). If the NETWORK user does not have enough rights, I believe I'll be able to release the windows service to our dept that managed AD - they could install it onto a single server running under one of the service accounts (which is not subject to the password change policy). What do people think, does this seem like a workable solution, is there something similar freely available? Regards, - Paul Hadfield. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |