Role-Based security: AzMan -
09-26-2007
, 05:54 AM
Hi, I've been wondering how to best implement role-based security and I
stumbled upon AzMan. As far as I can tell AzMan suits my needs but since
this is, to some extent, a philosophical question I wanted to see if anyone
had any comments on my decision.
I base my decision on the following criteria:
1. There exists an AD that must be used for user validation.
2. There exists a gui, don't want to implement that, for
administrators.
3. I want to build a gui depeneding on the roles for each user.
The real question here really has to do with statement 3, and i would like
to get some input to if this is a valid use? And if it is a valid use the
question about how one should reflect the changes an admin makes in the
gui. For instance if a role is altered (renamed, tasks removed or added)
how should this reflect in the gui especially since some of the tasks
should not be possible to add to some of the roles?
I know this is rather a broad question or rather just a list of statements
but any input would be appreciated since I'm not able to completely grasp
this subjet.
--
Should insert humorous qoute or remark about inserting a humorous qoute or
remark here. |