![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
|
I believe that is somewhat the plan in the next version. The reality is that the CF stuff was a real late addition to Studio 03, and there wasn't enough time to get it fully tested for inclusion into standard editions. Same thing with the stand-alone SDK (which would allow integration with things like SharpDevelop). Believe me, there's a lot of call for this from the embedded world where the C++ IDE and compilers have been free for some time. Trying to convince someone they now have to buy a $2000 package is a tough sell. -Chris "Nak" <a@a.com> wrote in message news:OdX$zTmcEHA.2736 (AT) TK2MSFTNGP10 (DOT) phx.gbl... Hi Chris, Con? How so? I'm just pointing out that device development isn't really an option without Studio Pro. The story may change with the release of Studio '05, but today that's how it is. Surely in this day and age of hi-tech modular programming they could have included the necessary device development features in each standardized component. I *personally* don't have the need for it at the moment anyway but if I did I would be seriously upset if I needed to purchase an extremely expensive piece of software to add this facility, like why not make a "VB.NET Mobile Edition" and make it only develop software for mobile devices then charge like £50 for it? Nick. |
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I believe that is somewhat the plan in the next version. The reality is that the CF stuff was a real late addition to Studio 03, and there wasn't enough time to get it fully tested for inclusion into standard editions. Same thing with the stand-alone SDK (which would allow integration with things like SharpDevelop). Believe me, there's a lot of call for this from the embedded world where the C++ IDE and compilers have been free for some time. Trying to convince someone they now have to buy a $2000 package is a tough sell. -Chris "Nak" <a@a.com> wrote in message news:OdX$zTmcEHA.2736 (AT) TK2MSFTNGP10 (DOT) phx.gbl... Hi Chris, Con? How so? I'm just pointing out that device development isn't really an option without Studio Pro. The story may change with the release of Studio '05, but today that's how it is. Surely in this day and age of hi-tech modular programming they could have included the necessary device development features in each standardized component. I *personally* don't have the need for it at the moment anyway but if I did I would be seriously upset if I needed to purchase an extremely expensive piece of software to add this facility, like why not make a "VB.NET Mobile Edition" and make it only develop software for mobile devices then charge like £50 for it? Nick. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi, There is always the free embedded visual tools 3.0. It doesnt support the compact framework you need vs.net 2003 pro or greater for that. http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=f663bf48-31ee-4cbe-aac5-0affd5fb27dd&displaylang=en Ken ------------------------------- "Randy" <Randus (AT) email (DOT) com> wrote in message news ORBd.17222$CH5.729 (AT) fed1read01 (DOT) ..So, is this available in VB Net 2005 Standard? aka temporarily Express beta? VB is still the thing to do, but in order to get it done, one needs portable deployment solutions. And yes getting embed for free and then having to pay for a CF option is hard, but for someone whose been reading about all this right along, one feels like it's expected that CF solutions should be part of ANY Dot Net product. I'm still not over the disappointment of this NOT be included in 2002 and now here I am looking at a 2003 version install and it's still not included? As a purchaser of VB 4,6, 7, 8 Can we not get a free CF upgrade VS studio solution as a download for free? Or do we have to wait for VB 2005, Standard, only to find out the only solution is to get the whole studio on that one too? Randy P.S. I'd spend 50 bucks on CF VB only add on, but I don't think I should have to. "Chris Tacke, eMVP" <ctacke[at]OpenNETCF_dot_org> wrote in message news:OcEmafmcEHA.4032 (AT) TK2MSFTNGP11 (DOT) phx.gbl... I believe that is somewhat the plan in the next version. The reality is that the CF stuff was a real late addition to Studio 03, and there wasn't enough time to get it fully tested for inclusion into standard editions. Same thing with the stand-alone SDK (which would allow integration with things like SharpDevelop). Believe me, there's a lot of call for this from the embedded world where the C++ IDE and compilers have been free for some time. Trying to convince someone they now have to buy a $2000 package is a tough sell. -Chris "Nak" <a@a.com> wrote in message news:OdX$zTmcEHA.2736 (AT) TK2MSFTNGP10 (DOT) phx.gbl... Hi Chris, Con? How so? I'm just pointing out that device development isn't really an option without Studio Pro. The story may change with the release of Studio '05, but today that's how it is. Surely in this day and age of hi-tech modular programming they could have included the necessary device development features in each standardized component. I *personally* don't have the need for it at the moment anyway but if I did I would be seriously upset if I needed to purchase an extremely expensive piece of software to add this facility, like why not make a "VB.NET Mobile Edition" and make it only develop software for mobile devices then charge like £50 for it? Nick. |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
As a purchaser of VB 4,6, 7, 8 Can we not get a free CF upgrade VS studio |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |